THE END DAYS
How do we know that Maitreya is the
Anti-Christ?
I. Jesus Christ is the Only-Begotten Son of God and Our Lord and
God
First, we are going to show, on the authority of God -- the true Author
of the Sacred Scripture -- and on the authority of His divine institution
-- His Mystical Body, the infallible Holy Roman Catholic Church, which approved
the Sacred Scripture -- that Jesus Christ is the Only-Begotten Son of God, and
that He is Our Lord and God.
Matthew 16:15-17. "Jesus saith to them: But whom do
you say that I am? Simon Peter answered and said: Thou art Christ, the Son of
the living God. And Jesus answering said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon
Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father
who is in heaven."
Matthew 26:63-64. "But Jesus held his peace. And
the high priest said to him: I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell
us if thou be the Christ the Son of God. Jesus saith to him: Thou hast said
it. Nevertheless I say to you, hereafter you shall see the Son of man sitting
on the right hand of the power of God and coming in the clouds of
heaven."
Luke 22:66-70. "And as soon as it was day, the
ancients of the people and the chief priests and scribes came together. And
they brought him into their council saying: If thou be the Christ, tell us.
And he saith to them: If I shall tell you, you will not believe me. And if I
shall also ask you, you will not answer me, nor let me go. But hereafter the
Son of man shall be sitting on the right hand of the power of God. Then said
they all: Art thou then the Son of God? And he said: You say that I
am."
After the resurrection, Jesus visited the Apostles.
Matthew 20:24-29. "Now Thomas, one of the twelve,
who is called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. The other disciples
therefore said to him: We have seen the Lord. But he said to them: Except I
shall see in his hands the print of the nails and put my finger into the place
of the nails and put my hand into his side, I will not believe. And after
eight days, again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them. Jesus
cometh, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst and said: Peace be to
you. Then he said to Thomas: Put in thy finger hither and see my hands. And
bring hither the hand and put it into my side. And be not faithless, but
believing. Thomas answered and said to him: My Lord
and my God. Jesus saith to him: Because thou hast
seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are
they that have not seen and have believed."
II Maitreya denies Jesus Christ
born 2,000 years ago to be the ONLY-BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD and claims himself to be
just that.
Based on his teaching materials at his web site "www.maitreya.org" , he
previously quoted Matthew 24: 4-5 with the name Jesus being changed to Esa.
This is Maitreya's quotation: "And in answer Esa said to
them, 'Take care that no one leads you astray. For many will come in my name,
saying, 'I am the Christ,' and they will lead many astray."
The true quotation of Matthew 24: 4-5 is: "And
Jesus answering, said to
them: Take heed that no man seduce you. For many will come in my name saying, I
am Christ. And they will seduce many."
His so-called disciple, in the latest revision of his web site, quotes Mark
(13: 37) as "Thus Esa warned
all future humanity through His followers: And what I say unto you, I say unto
all, Watch!" Everything inside the double quotations is meant to be
the quotation of verse 37 chapter 13 in the Gospel of St. Mark.
But the true quotation of Mark (13: 37) is "And what I
say to you, I say to all: Watch." The sentence "Thus Esa
warned all future humanity through His followers:" is added to the
Gospel of St. Mark. Esa here, just as in the
false quotation of the Gospel of St. Matthew, is used instead of Jesus.
One may ask, "what is the name Esa by which
Maitreya calls Jesus?" In other words, who is
Esa?
In order to answer this riddle, we need to review some basic philosophy and
its Latin language. Let's quote Jacques Maritain, a well-known Catholic
philosopher, a professor at the Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies in
Toronto, appointed to chairs at Universities of Chicago, Columbia, and Princeton
from 1948 to 1961. In his book An Introduction to Philosophy (first
published 1930, reprinted by Christian Classics, Westminster MD 21157, 1991), we
find:
"We are compelled ... to admit a cause which moves without being
moved, causes without being caused, cannot lack existence, contains in its
purity the perfection of which things partake in greater or less degree,
possesses an intellect which is the final ground of all natures and the first
principle of all things. Such a cause we term God; it is pure act, deriving
its existence from itself (a se). In
other words, being itself is its nature or essence, it is subsistent Being
itself: he who is." (Maritain, ibid., page 180)
"A thing is said to exist in itself
(in se) when it does not exist as
part of a whole previously existing, but itself constitutes the whole which
exists. In this sense Peter exists in himself." (Maritain, ibid., page
163.)
"A thing is said to exist by itself or in virtue of
itself (per se) when it is
brought into existence in virtue of itself, or of its own nature (by the
causes on which it depends, if it is a created nature). In this sense Peter
exists per se." (Maritain,
ibid., page 163.)
"That which exists a se or
from itself, possessing in itself the entire
explanation of its existence, is uncaused; God alone is
from himself, a se.
Created substances on the contrary (created subjects of action) are caused;
they exist per se, in virtue of their
essence; they do not exist a se. In
their own nature they possess everything necessary to receive existence, but
not to possess an existence not received from without. They are sufficient by
themselves to exist, in the strictly qualified sense that they do not exist as
something which belongs to something else, but, absolutely speaking, they are
by no means a sufficient ground of their own existence." (Maritain,
ibid., page 163)
"That which is a se cannot cease
to exist; that which is per se
without being a se can lose its
existence." (Maritain, ibid., p. 164.)
It is clear from
philosophy that a creature like Peter exists in
se and per se but not
a se. Only God exists a se.
Recall that many years ago in some recording cassette tapes sold by
satan-worshipping musicians/singers there are some lyrics that if you play them
back in reverse you will hear the words like "kill yourself", "commit suicide",
"worship satan". The same principle applies here. The reverse of
a se is es
a, or esa. The reverse
of the Uncreated (God, a se) is the
created, the esa. Thus, it is
quite clear that Maitreya craftily hides his blasphemy and denial of Jesus to be
God under the name Esa.
By downgrading Jesus to be a mere man, Maitreya denies that Jesus is God and
therefore the Only-Begotten Son of God, the Christ, the Messiah. Instead, on his
web site, he claims himself to be the Only-Begotten Son of God, the Christ, the
Messiah. In other words, he implicitly accuses Our Lord Jesus Christ to be a
fraud, an impostor, the same name that King Herod Agrippa and other founders of
the Masonry used to call Jesus.
III. Denial of Jesus Christ as the Only-Begotten Son of God and the
Christ incurs anathema from the Catholic Church.
Council of Nicea I in 325 declared against the Arians who did not believe in
the divine nature of Jesus Christ:
The Nicene Creed
We believe in one God the Father almighty, creator
of all things visible and invisible. And in our one Lord Jesus Christ the Son
of God, the only-begotten born of the Father, that is of the substance of the
Father, God of God, light of light, true God of true God, born, not made, of
one substance with the Father (which they call in Greek "homousion"), by whom
all things were made, which are in heaven and on earth, who for our
salvation came down, and became incarnate and was made man, and suffered, and
arose again on the third day, and ascended into heaven, and will come to judge
the living and the dead. And in the Holy Spirit.
But those who say: "There was [a time] when he was
not," and, "Before he was born, he was not," and "Because he was made from
non-existing matter, he is either of another substance or essence," and those
who call "God the Son of God changeable and mutable," these the Catholic
Church anathematizes. (Denzinger, The
Sources of Catholic Dogma, 30th Edition, # 54, p. 26)
Pope St. Leo IX on his epistle "Congratulamur vehementer" to
Peter, Bishop of Antioch, April 13, 1053 declared the symbol of faith:
For I firmly believe that the Holy Trinity, the
Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, is one omnipotent God, and in the
Trinity the whole Godhead is co-essential and consubstantial, co-eternal aud
co-omnipotent, all things, through whom all things, in whom all things [Rom.
11:36] which are in heaven or on earth, visible or invisible. Likewise I
believe that each person in the Holy Trinity is the one true God, complete and
perfect.
I believe also that the Son of God the Father, the
Word of God, was born eternallly before all time from the Father,
consubstantial, co-omnipotent, and co-equal to the Father through all things
in divinity; born of the Holy Spirit from the ever virgin Mary in time, with a
rational soul, having two nativities, the one from the Father, eternal, the
other from the Mother, in time; having two wills and opcrations, true God and
true man, individual in each nature and perfect, not having suffered a fusion
and division, not adopted or phantastical, the one and onlv God, the Son of
God in two natures, but in the singleness of one person, incapable of
suffering and immortal in divinity; but in humanity for us and for our
salvation suffered in the true passion of the body and was buried, and arose
from the dead on the third day in the true resurrection of the body; because
of which we must declare with the disciples that He ate from no need of food
but only from will and power; on the fortieth day after His resurrection with
the flesh in which He arose, and with His soul He ascended into heaven and
sits at the right hand of the Father, whence on the tenth day He sent the Holy
Spirit, and thence, as He ascended, He will come to judge the living and the
dead, and will render to each one according to his works.
I believe also that the Holy Spirit, complete and
perfect and true God, proceeding from the Father and the Son, co-equal,
co-essential, co-omnipotent and coeternal with the Father and the Son in all
respects, has spoken through the prophets.
That this holy and individual Trinity is not three
Gods, but in three persons and in one nature and or essence [is] one God
omnipotent, external, invisible and incommutable, so I believe and confess, so
that I may truly proclaim that the Father is not begotten, the Son is the only
begotten one, and the Holy Spirit is neither begotten nor unbegotten, but
proceeds from the Father and the Son.
I
believe that the one true Church is holy, Catholic and apostolic, in which is
given one baptism and the true remission of all sins. I also believe in a true
resurrection of this body, which now I bear, and in eternal life.
I believe also that there is one author of the New
and Old Testament of the law both of the Prophets and of the Apostles, namely
the omnipotent God and Lord. (I believe) that God predestined only the good
things, but that He foreknew the good and the evil. I believe and profess that
the grace of God precedes and follows man, yet in such a manner that I do not
deny free will to the rational creature. I also believe and declare that the
soul is not a part of God but was created from nothing and was without baptism
subject to original sin.
Furthermore, I declare anathema every heresy raising
itself against the holy Catholic Church, and likewise him whosoever has
honored or believes that any writings beyond those which the Catholic Church
accepts ought to be held in authority or has venerated them. I accept entirely
the four Councils and I venerate them as the four Gospels, because through
four parts of the world the universal Church, upon these as on square stone,
has been founded . . . . Equally I accept and venerate the three
remaining Councils. . . . Whatever the above mentioned seven holy and
universal Councils believe and praise I also believe and praise, and whomever
they declare anathema, I declare anathema. (Denzinger, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, 30th
Edition, # 343-349, p. 141-142)
IV. Is Maitreya an
Anti-Christ?
Let's quote the Sacred Scripture to see whether Maitreya can be called an
Anti-Christ.
1 John 2:22-23. "Who is a liar, but he who denieth
that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father and the
Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that
confesseth the Son hath the Father also."
John 5:23. "That all men may honour the Son, as they
honour the Father. He who honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father who
hath sent him."
John 4:1-3. " Dearly beloved, believe not every
spirit, but try the spirits if they be of God: because many false prophets are
gone out into the world. By this is the spirit of God known. Every spirit
which confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every
spirit that dissolveth Jesus is not of God. And this is Antichrist, of whom
you have heard that he cometh: and he is now already in the
world."
Note 1: Try the spirits... Viz.,
by examining whether their teaching be agreeable to the rule of the Catholic
faith, and the doctrine of the church. For as he says, (ver. 6,) He that
knoweth God, heareth us [the pastors of the church]. By this we know the
spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
Note 2: Every spirit which
confesseth, etc... Not that the confession of this point of faith
alone, is, at all times, and in all cases, sufficient; but that with relation
to that time, and for that part of the Christian doctrine, which was then
particularly to be confessed, taught, and maintained against the heretics of
those days, this was the most proper token, by which the true teachers might
be distinguished form the false.
Note 3: That dissolveth Jesus...
Viz., either by denying his humanity, or his divinity.
John 5:10-12. " He that believeth in the Son of God
hath the testimony of God in himself. He that believeth not the Son maketh him
a liar: because he believeth not in the testimony which God hath testified of
his Son. And this is the testimony that God hath given to us eternal life. And
this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life. He that hath not the
Son hath not life."
Note: He that believeth not the
Son, etc... By refusing to believe the testimonies given by the
three divine persons, that Jesus was the Messias, and the true Son of God, by
whom eternal life is obtained and promised to all that comply with his
doctrine. In him we have also this lively confidence, that we shall obtain
whatever we ask, according to his will, when we ask what is for our good, with
perseverance, and in the manner we ought. And this we know, and have
experience of, by having obtained the petitions that we have made.
The above
quotations from the Sacred Scripture show beyond doubt that Maitreya is an
Anti-Christ. But this Anti-Christ is not just any other Anti-Christ who simply
claims to be God. This Anti-Christ will have the support of almost all mankind
as he will unify all religions of the world. This unification can only be done
on a worldwide scale when communication technology is sufficiently advanced as
in the present. Moreover, behind him is the financial, political, and military
power of the world. This Anti-Christ is like no other Anti-Christ. Thus, he can
be truly called the Anti-Christ.
The coming of the Anti-Christ has already been prophesied in the Gospel by
Our Lord Jesus Christ 2,000 years ago:
John 5:43. "I am come in the name of my Father, and
you receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him you will
receive."
Worship of God is required of all creature including
Maitreya. By refusing to recognize Jesus as the Messiah and the Christ, Maitreya
refuses to kneel down before Jesus to worship Him as God. Let's quote the Sacred
Scripture.
Philippians 2:5-11. "For let this mind be in you,
which was also in Christ Jesus: Who being in the form of God, thought it not
robbery to be equal with God: But emptied himself, taking the form of a
servant, being made in the likeness of men, and in habit found as a man. He
humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even to the death of the cross.
For which cause, God also hath exalted him and hath given him a name which is
above all names: That in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those
that are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth: And that every tongue
should confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the
Father."
(Note: Emptied himself, exinanivit...
made himself as of no account.)
Why does Maitreya refuse to worship Jesus as
God? Because he claims himself to be God and will demand worship from man.
2 Thessalonians 2: 3-4. "Let no man deceive you by
any means: for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be
revealed, the son of perdition who opposeth and is lifted up above all that is
called God or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God,
shewing himself as if he were God."
(Note: A revolt... the general apostasy, falling away from the true
faith, that occurs before the coming of the great Anti-Christ. The man of
sin... Here must be meant some particular man, as is evident from the frequent
repetition of the Greek article ò, the man of sin, the son of perdition, the
adversary or opposer. It agrees to the wicked and great Antichrist, who will
come before the second Coming of Jesus Christ)
V Maitreya's teaching that all
religions, as represented by the seven great religions contained in his great
sign, form eternal divine path capable of leading to God directly contradicts
Our Lord Jesus Christ's teaching.
John 11:25-26. "Jesus said to her: I am the
resurrection and the life: he that believeth in me, although he be dead, shall
live: And every one that liveth and believeth in me shall not die for
ever."
John 8:12. "Again therefore, Jesus spoke to: them,
saying: I am the light of the world. He that followeth me walketh not in
darkness, but shall have the light of life."
John 12:46. "I am come, a light into the world,
that whosoever believeth in me may not remain in darkness."
Our
Lord Jesus Christ, true God and true Man, has taught that there is only one way
leading to God, one truth leading to The Eternal Truth and Eternal Life. And
yet, Maitreya claims that all religions lead to God, the Divine Truth.
John 14:6. "Jesus saith to him: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me."
John 17:3. "Now this is eternal life: That they may
know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast
sent."
Moreover, there is no other name who can save mankind
except Jesus Christ. Yet Maitreya claims he can save mankind.
Acts 4:12. "Neither is there salvation in any
other. For there is no other name under heaven given to men, whereby we must
be saved."
Since there is only one truth, the truth taught be Our
Lord Jesus Christ who was born about 2,000 years ago, the other teaching by
Maitreya must be false. And no one can lead man to God except through Jesus
Christ. Thus Maitreya's claim that the path represented by all major religions
lead to God must be false. Since there is only one name that can save man and
that name is Jesus Christ, Maitreya's claim of saving man must be false.
Galatians 1:8-9. "But though we, or an angel from
heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let
him be anathema. As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to
you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be
anathema."
Thus, if anyone including Maitreya who teaches a
gospel that is different from the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, he would
bring on himself an anathema.
But it is not enough to believe in Jesus Christ to be saved. To be saved, one
has belong to the Holy Roman Catholic Church, outside of which there is no
salvation. Various Popes in the past has defined ex-cathedra the dogma "Outside
the Roman Catholic Church there is no salvation" (extra Ecclesiam nullam esse salutem) and has condemned
the error of indifferentism which says that
all religions can save.
Pope Boniface VIII in the Bull "Unam Sanctam", November 18, 1302, declared
ex-cathedra:
"We firmly believe and simply confess this (Church)
outside which there is no salvation nor remission of sin." (Denzinger, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, 30th
Edition, # 468, p. 186)
(Note: the Bull is the most authoritative
document of the Church which the Pope signs and seals with his ring
[bulla].)
"Furthermore, we declare, say, define, and proclaim
to every human creature that they by necessity for salvation are entirely
subject to the Roman Pontiff." (Denzinger, ibid. , 30th
Edition, # 469, p. 187)
Pope Eugene IV declared ex-cathedra in the Bull "Cantata Domino" on February 4,
1442:
"It (the Roman Catholic Church) firmly
believes, professes, and proclaims that those not
living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics
and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart
"into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his
angels" [Matthew 25:4I],
unless before the end of life the same have been added to the
flock; and that the unity of the ecclesiastical
body is so strong that only to those remaining in it are the sacraments of the
Church of benefit for salvation, and do fastings, almsgiving, and other
functions of piety and exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward,
and that no one, whatever almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed
blood for the name of Christ, can be saved, unless he has remained in the
bosom and unity of the Catholic Church." (Denzinger, Op.
Cit., 30th Edition, # 714, p. 230).
Pope Pius IV in the Bull "Iniunctum
Nobis", November 13, 1565, declared ex-cathedra:
"This true Catholic faith, outside of which no one
can be saved." (Denzinger, Op.
Cit., 30th Edition, # 1000, p. 304)
Pope Gregory XVI, in his Encyclical
"Mirari Vos" On Liberalism and Religious
Indifferentism, August, 15, 1832, pronounced against the error of indifferentism which Maitreya proclaims:
"14. We now come to another and most fruitful
cause of the evils which at present afflict the Church and which We so
bitterly deplore; We mean indifferentism, or that
fatal opinion everywhere diffused by the craft of the wicked, that men can
by the profession of any faith obtain the eternal salvation of their souls, provided their
life conforms to justice and probity. But in a
question so clear and evident it will undoubtedly be easy for Us to pluck up
from amid the people confided to your care so pernicious an error. The apostle
warns us of it: "One God, one faith, one
baptism." Let them tremble then who imagine that
every creed leads by an easy path to the port of felicity; and reflect
seriously on the testimony of our Savior Himself, that those are against
Christ who are not with Christ, and that they miserably scatter by the fact
that they gather not with Him, and that consequently they will perish
eternally without any doubt, if they do not hold to the Catholic Faith, and
preserve it entire and without alteration...."
"15. From this
poisoned source of indifferentism flow that false and absurd, or rather
extravagant, maxim that liberty of
conscience should be
established and guaranteed to each man -- a most contagious error, to which
leads that absolute and unbridled liberty of opinion which for the ruin of
Church and State spreads over the world, and which some men, by unbridled
impudence, fear not to represent as advantageous to the Church. "And what more
certain death for souls," says Saint Augustine, "than the liberty of
error!" (Angelus Press, 2918 Tracy Avenue, Kansas City, MI
64109; pages 11-12.)
In similar terms, Pope Pius IX declared against
the error of indifferentism in his Encyclical
"Quanto Conficiamur moerore", August 10, 1863 :
"And here, beloved Sons and Venerable Brothers, We
should mention again and censure a very grave error
in which some Catholics are unhappily engaged, who believe that men living in
error, and separated from the true faith and from Catholic unity, can attain
eternal life. Indeed,
this is certainly quite contrary to Catholic teaching. It is known to Us and to you that they who labor in invincible
ignorance of our most holy religion and who, zealously keeping the natural law
and its precepts engraved in the hearts of all by God and being ready to obey
God, live an honest and upright life, can, by the operating power of divine
light and grace, attain eternal life, since God who clearly beholds, searches,
and knows the minds, souls, thoughts, and habits of all men, because of His
great goodness and mercy, will by no means suffer anyone to be punished with
eternal torment who has not the guilt of deliberate sin. But, the Catholic dogma that no one
can be saved outside the Catholic Church is well-known; and
also that those who are obstinate toward the
authority and definitions of the same Church, and who persistently separate
themselves from the unity of the Church, and from the Roman Pontiff, the
successor of PETER, to whom "the guardianship of the vine has been entrusted
by the Savior," cannot obtain eternal salvation." (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1677, p. 424-425)
The
following three errors (among others) are also condemned by Pope Pius IX, i.e. those who
believe them are anathematized:
1. "In the worship of any religion whatever,
men can find the way to eternal salvation, and can attain eternal
salvation." (I, 3, 17) (The numbers following each statement refer
to the INDEX "of the Acts of PlUS lX, from which the Syllabus or Collection
has been excerpted) (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1716, p. 437).
2. "We must have at least good hope concerning the eternal
salvation of all those who in no wise are in the true Church of
Christ." (13) (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1717, p. 437).
3. "Protestantism is nothing else than a different form of the
same true Christian religion, in which it is possible to serve God as well as
in the Catholic Church." (5) (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1718, p.
437)
Remember that an ex-cathedra
definition or declaration by a legitimate Pope has the force of an dogmatic
truth the refusal of which means excommunication and being cut off from the
Mystical Body of Christ, and therefore, being cursed (anathematized). In
addition, the definition or declaration (which usually starts with "We firmly believe, profess, and proclaim that ...."
for a positive definition, and "let him be
anathema" for a negative definition) is irreversible, meaning that no
statement from any other Pope afterward can contradict the previously declared
dogma.
Pope Pius IX defined the infallibility of the
Pope as he chaired the First Vatican Council (session 4) on July 18,
1870:
"And so We, adhering faithfully to the
tradition received from the beginning of the Christian faith, to the glory of
God, our Savior, the elevation of the Catholic religion and the salvation of
Christian peoples, with the approbation of the sacred Council, teach and
explain that the dogma has been divinely revealed. That the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when
carrying out the duty of the pastor and teacher of all Christians in accord
with his supreme apostolic authority he explains a
doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the
universal Church, through the divine assistance promised him in blessed Peter,
operates with that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer wished that His church be
instructed in defining doctrine on faith and morals; and so such definitions of the Roman Pontiff
from himself, but not from the consensus of the Church, are unalterable." (Denzinger,
Op. Cit., # 1839, p. 457)
"But if anyone presumes to contradict this
definition of Ours, which may God forbid: let him be anathema."
(Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1840, p. 457)
Most recently, in his Speech to the
Third General Assembly of Latin American Bishops, January 28, 1979; and in the
Radio Message on Eighth Centenary of St. Francis of Assisi, October 3, 1981,
Pope John Paul II reaffirmed the Sacred Tradition:
"The mystery of salvation is revealed to us and is
continued and accomplished in the Church . . . and from this genuine and
single source, like ' humble, useful, precious, and chaste' water, it reaches
the whole world . . .
"She must therefore he called upon, respected, and
served; for no one can have God for his Father if he does not have the Church
for his Mother. One cannot love Christ without loving the Church Christ loves.
The Spirit of the Church is the Spirit of Christ, and to the extent to which
one loves the Church of Christ does he possess the Holy Spirit . .
.
"We have to be conscious of and absorb this
fundamental and revealed truth, contained in the phrase hallowed by Tradition:
There is no salvation outside the
Church. From her alone flows surely and fully the
life-giving force destined, in Christ and in His Spirit, to renew the whole of
humanity, and therefore directing every human being to become a part of the
Mystical Body of Christ." (Quoted from K.E.
Gillette, Jesus Christ Catholic, Victory Publication, 1983, page
549)
To clarify the dogma that "there is no
salvation outside the Catholic Church", Pope Innocent III repeated,
in a letter to Humbert, Archbishop of Arles, in 1201, what has been the Sacred
Tradition of the Church:
"We say that a distinction must be made, that
sin is twofold: namely, original and actual: original, which is contracted without
consent; and actual
which is committed with consent. Original, therefore, which is committed
without consent, is remitted without consent through the power of the
sacrament; but actual, which is contracted with consent, is not mitigated in
the slightest without consent. . . . The punishment
of original sin is deprivation of the vision of God, but the punishment of actual sin is
the torments of everlasting hell ..."
(Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 410, p. 161)
(Note: the vision of God is
also called the Vision of Beatitude, or the Beatific Vision.)
VI. As Maitreya
changes the words of the Gospel, he is called a liar by the Sacred
Scripture.
By changing the Name of Jesus (God and man,
Son of God) in the Gospel of St. Matthew and St. Mark into Esa (only a creature), he
changes the Sacred Scripture to point to him as the Messiah or the Christ.
Proverbs 30:5-6. "Every word of God is fire tried:
he is a buckler to them that hope in him. Add not any thing to his words, lest
thou be reproved and found a liar."
(Note: Is fire tried... That is, most pure, like gold purified by
fire.)
Deuteronomy 4:2. "You shall not add to the word that
I speak to you, neither shall you take away from it: keep the commandments of
the Lord your God which I command you."
V. It has been
established beyond doubt above by Maitreya's own teaching that he is a liar, a
deceiver, and the Anti-Christ. Then he is also
a son of Satan, the Devil, in exactly the same way that Our Lord
Jesus Christ said of the Jews who refused to believe in Him as the Christ and
the Messiah:
John 8:44. "You are of your father the devil: and
the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning:
and he stood not in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a
lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father
thereof."
VII.
Conclusion: Why should one believe in a liar,
a deceiver, a blasphemer, a murderer of souls, an anathema, and a son of Satan,
the Devil? And the Anti-Christ Maitreya is all of these.
In any case, remember the Anti-Christ Maitreya, in the end, will be defeated
by Jesus Christ and His army of Angels and Saints, and be cast alive into Hell.
Apocalypse 19:19-21. "And I saw the beast and the
kings of the earth and their armies, gathered together to make war with him
that sat upon the horse and with his army. And the beast was taken, and with
him the false prophet who wrought signs before him, wherewith he seduced them
who received the character of the beast and who adored his image.
These two were cast alive into the pool of fire
burning with brimstone. And the rest were slain by
the sword of him that sitteth upon the horse, which proceedeth out of his
mouth: and all the birds were filled with their flesh."
![]()
"Who is like unto God?"
Created July 16, 1996. First version of this article: Feast of the Holy
Mother of God, January 1, 1998. First revision: 8:42 AM 2/10/98.