Simple Mechanics
My personal view on light as a Layman
I intend to update this area soon, check back , as I have not received any counter complaints , I assume I am going in the right direction with it, and intend to get a little more detailed.
[please read addendum's at bottom , as they reason the cause and effect using sound known scientific principles , and are provable to a point]
Motional mechanics of electromagnetics
Light in this physical universe "Must" obey physical rules according to it's nature , a clue into some of it's rules is the "Doppler effect" observed by Astronomers, Speaking to Amateur radio operators, we know that to speed up an oscillator is to increase the frequency , and we "Know" that Red is on the low end of the frequency scale of visible light and that Blue is on the upper end (Higher frequency), then to use logic , a middle color of a Sun is assumed to be white (Nearly) in most cases , at least for this narrative reference. Using the aforementioned facts , if the Sun is moving toward you at some speed , it will tend toward the Blue end of the spectrum , essentially speeding up the frequency by imparting the motion to it's output, and Red , if moving away from you to satisfy the rules. Now it can be argued that it simply is changing frequency and not speed , no so once you think about it , the frequency changes because the primary source has not changed , is due to the "time constant" changing enroute , imparted by the motional speed of the generator. But there is more complex physics in operation here , it simply does not go on increasing in frequency , as that would mean it holds to the speed/oscillation we can measure forever, there is plateau of time to be considered, a truism , is that light as we understand it cannot surpass the speed we have measured, rather it changes due to the time constant that restricts frequency , as it will go to zero somewhere at the upper end of the blue spectrum , hence Einstein's theorem. It MUST shift to another energy form , not slow down , likely light is not even in the spectrum of radio waves , but is the next conversion level .
The end result and commonality , is that it all is electromagnetic wave particles , at differing speeds , what it becomes when it surpasses the time constant allowed for light , is conjecture at best , as we have no reference to test it at this time ( nor the technology).
However it (Light) , still can be speeded up past light speed , if an object that produces light is moving toward an object that is receiving it , move the generator fast enough and it , even though the ETs on board can see no difference , it moves into the next level of conversion, ""the time constant laws absolutely demand it"".
AS far as Mass is concerned , with all it's electromagnet properties held in place by it's matrix , and at a constant frequency dictated by the same matrix , is not subject to shift in the same way free electromagnetic waves are , thus different laws need to be applied , hence Einstein's Mass Velocity law, which is simply the energy applied to get it to the desired speed, we know to slow it down to the starting speed , it requires the same amount of power has to be applied in relationship to the speed at onset (and Einstein's theorem needs to be examined closer to allow understanding the Higgs Boson Z particle).
Where many thinkers/researchers have gone wrong is assuming our World is stationary, it's not (rather this part is over looked), all the speed that has been imparted to it had to be included in the equation to be bound by the current theory, which is simply not possible.
One "must" consider the outer arms of our little galactic spot in the Milky Way , the forward motion of the Milky Way (in relationship to the rest of known matter objects/systems) , the spiral motion of it, and along it's arms there is differing speed according to it's position in the same.
Believe me , the above is a very , very , simplistic view into the ever increasing complexity of motional mechanics , in relation to our little ball of Dirt we call home, when it's stated that we can't go beyond the speed of light , I must ask as opposed to what reference?
Light is not mass in the respect it has been separated from a confining matrix , it's laws are different as opposed to a fixed matrix, which cause the time constant to remain fixed , once a field is expressed in free space , it can't change it's speed , it must abide by the mechanics at the time of expression , if the expression is from a hi-speed mass , then it must behave in relationship to it's surroundings according to the energy imparted to it , whether it's time (Speed), or direction until acted upon , once the time constant has been imparted to it , likely it can't be changed , only the direction of travel. In a sense , you might say electromagnetic energy is the opposite of mass (Z Boson) energy , because everything causes the mass to change, except it's frequency matrix , as that is super resistant to change , and mass "can" exist at zero everything, my suggestion is that if a trial run on a device to surpass the calculated sped of light is to cool the mass down to near absolute zero to prevent stray electromagnetic energy from converting to something possibly destructive (a nasty unknown).
Kyle Gosnell
Addendom 1
I have been meaning to clarify the piece about Light speed but wanted to find just the right description to satisfy the most demanding questions on my stance , but though I can point out the Time Constant factor that demands change , I can't prove anything other than point to the Time Constant that demands change.
If the Time laws do not change from what we understand, then the Light Wave reaches zero just above the ultraviolet range and becomes modulated as the speed is increased, and I would suspect it is modulated at about midway of the range we are able to measure to compensate for the alteration . As far as point to point measurement , it would remain at a constant ratio speed until it reaches zero again into another compression wave (C "change primary" to C2 "change compression" or "Due to" , and "into") should equal zero velocity increase, and then next phase change modulation and so fourth at the new imparted speed. The compression wave would contain the components of the entire wave length that is separated into a compression wave to satisfy the Time Constant ratio. I have been worrying the idea of how to inject another light frequency to obtain a third small enough to measure, either phasing or direct insertion to get a harmonic, the result would likely be a very small difference in a compressed wave , but I think it could be measured this way if it's understood that the result would only be a tiny portion of the width of the compressed wave , but enough to get a measurable reading of some sort. Who knows , it may be as simple as projecting a Laser out and away from the telescope , and look for different readings than before it was done (Phasing), but due to the infrequency , I think it would be a rare occasion to get anything above L1 ( LP equals Light prime rate, L1 = Delta time/speed rate for first change ) unless intelligence produced it , and perhaps even L1 could contain intelligence as it would be rare enough to warrant inspection , and for those who are able to view it , an easily recognized change from the norm.
Addendum 2 added 01/14/2001
A light wave that has reached the end of it's time constant must be modulated to go beyond that point , and due to the natural way of balance it must also modulate at right angles , making it behave like an independent particle , where in fact , it contains x times the original wave distance , such as example 7 wavelets at the break-over frequency of near 0 frequency/time, it will modulate at a , or near mid frequency to satisfy the conservation of energy law , as the mid point is logical as the least resistive. It would seem there would be a lot of pent-up energy in those "particles".
You are not changing the physical aspect of the wave , rather allowing for the time constant , as the speed is increased , it must lend energy (Translate) to the whole to satisfy mathematics that dictate rigidity of primary expression . I see there has to be written another type of Ohms law , to allow measurement such as time , speed , modulation. The wave modulation would contain the amount of light expressed at the breakover frequency divided by mid frequency , however to satisfy the time constant, the space would have to be calculated between modulations gaps and viewed as a square wave with definite stop/o points. Or more precisely a half square wave as it cant go backwards , with the gap at mid frequency radiation , and have to be viewed as a zero modulation function , the leading edge of the wave would contain a lot of energy,(or the back edge dependent upon viewpoint) , in any case it would be rather noticeable as the wavelet would contain the pentup energy of all of the near zero electromagnetic waves for that block/particle.
The missing link between the theoretical and the physical is time, as that is the only rigid factor we can calculate from , then add momentum , then add factors of mass or non-mass ( T & Mo & Ma or NMa) Do we have Ohms law or not ? , and is there any takers on writing this new way of applying it ?
Einstein wrote that Light could not exceed it's wave speed , which is true according to two fixed points as reference , mathematics demand it , however he did not calculate momentum of the generator, which brings it into the theoretical arena, as a blue light we can see , will always be blue to the reference point of equa-directional momentum, however it leaves that area when momentum is applied and viewed from another point . Hence we come to the Delta factor , if the reference point and the generator is moving away from the new viewpoint , the blue will start toward red in relationship to its momentum applying the time difference, can it be so far from your understanding that the time constant factor would change in the other direction also , to a shorter wave length?, bear in mind the generator is still generating the simple blue light , but the momentum factor is in effect. Time demands it's toll , and since a frequency can't be a frequency at zero, something has to give, hence a modulation of the near zero wave , allowing it to contain waves at the near zero frequency , and satisfy the momentum that is applied . Again the time factor absolutely demands change as energy cannot exist as a solid , and to conceive of an instant-on resistive factor that alters magically anything attempting to surpass a given momentum range , is as silly as the so-called sound barrier, because resistance has it's absolute mathematical parameters also , it is "linear" , so , long before anything reached light speed it would burn it up, to have that much resistance , then light could "not" reach us from the stars , as it has an annoying tendency toward bouncing off obstructions.
( the only energy that can effect light is the Z Boson , under certain conditions , free Z Boson lends mass-like properties/charge to it such as near a Black Hole , and only bends it slightly around large bodies with massive G fields ) Kyle Gosnell 01/14/2001
