I comment on my view of events and situations , in mostly science , but the viewer must understand, I am NOT a Scientist , or have any viable credentials anyone of note would acknowledge , except you, but you know what? You are the most important , as you and I , live in the real world, and have to deal with situations the "Experts" are shielded from , sort of like the background fellows who make the shuttle go up, the "In the trench" laborers , who actually make it happen.

In fact life seems to have occupied just about every niche on our world , which is contradictory to what we have allowed ourselves to believe. And the latter proves that life can occupy , almost all environments in our Solar system also. We know life can exist at subzero temperatures as well as temperatures so high it would cook any food we are able to eat, at the fumaroles on the bottom of the Sea (Smokers), and likely melt some metals, not withstanding the fact that the so-called water is so acidic, it qualifies as acid. Now it's known that certain viruses and bacteria survived on the moon inside a camera for a while, I might add , in a vacuum. The only thing at this time that can't be predicted, is the incubator, and just how extreme the environment can vary and still allow propagation. Most interesting , so now what does that leave us? It , in reality shows that life can exist in every conceivable environment, and perhaps even on the surface of the Sun. So the question now is no longer if ?, but where , and how advanced in physical makeup, AND how diverse, as no one would argue that an ecosystem is mono-systemic. As a mono-systemic setup would suggest import, hmmmmm.

The following is not going to set well with the folks who pay the bill for putting up orbital stations, in this case the testing lab for ,and working on off Planet bio-organisms. The Platform needed for this endeavor is not to be placed in Earth orbit, rather in a Lunar orbit. Well , the why is as plain as the nose on your face, simple contamination , and considering the types of Organisms planned to be tested, the Orbit needs to be around another body, due to the possibility of accidental damage, which would cause the orbiter to go in. There is no guarantee that full burn up could be caused, and remnants would reach Earth . The piece on "life" spells it out , as to the possible colonizing of other Solar Bodies, through the process that brought the Mars rocks here. But until I see that there is other life incubators in our system, I am in the opinion that if there is life, it came from Terra firma, as our little World is already known to spawn life for every niche in the world, in every conceivable environment extreme. At least the ruling bodies of Science now admits that harsh is not an impediment. To put it as simply as I know how, our world is an incubator, and likely has seeded the other planets, but depending on where the material comes down, is whether it takes hold. So the possibility of Life is slim, but due to the bodies that have struck the Earth in the past, and there was a lot of them, it is no stretch of the imagination to see that pieces fell on other worlds , and large satellites.

Now , even though the material likely is of Earth origin , it has had a lot of time to alter it's function to cope with the new environment, to allow duplication of itself as that is the primal urge common to the life here. The key is the diversity of the ecosystem found, if it contains two uncommon types of bacterium or a viral agent, that place MUST be treated as an incubator.

The Platform needed for such an operation , in reality needs to be a two step operation , other than the surface craft that retrieves it, a Orbital lab around the target body, and one around our Moon, as the Lunar platform would allow real time experiments to be done, at a safe distance. Before anyone starts to cry about the cost, placing the orbiter circling the moon , would give us a measure of safety , and likely prevent a World-wide pandemic, hostile to our environment, which no cost is too high to prevent that.

Yes, there will be developed nastiest on board that orbiter, and likely a germ-warfare unit is in place in every major Country , chomping at the bit to have access, such is life . Science must take a back set to certain endeavors, otherwise there is no funding, and likely bans placed on the operation to prevent others from using it for such testing, in other words, you don't play,there will be no pay. There must be a well thought out operational techniques in place , when such as the whole of the latter is ready.

I am no Einstein , but I do understand the need for collaborative laws in Science. There are twists in our applications of regimens that are opposed , this must change. In the pieces placed on this site , I write about Light Speed Laws that are flawed at the basic level, because I don't believe in Magic, as everything is a matter of cause and effect. If you are going to make an assumption about Einstein Equations , DON'T take anyone's word for it, read for yourself what "he" said, and test his equations, errors have come in and are soon to come into conflict with the real applicational science, and true to Human nature, everyone will blame poor Einstein, rather than their own misread and misconception about his findings, and how he applied his mathematical discoveries.

Before I move on, light is measured incorrectly, as the means we use to measure it mechanically are flawed, logic dictates that if you move an object and make it stay in motion, as opposed to another object of similar composition and size that remains static, there are distinct differences, as one is moving and the other is stationary correct? Why would one apply a different set of protocols to other mass and energy, soooo, we must assume the testing is incorrect, and only a minor part is being tested and measured, and the method used is finite, where as the actual action is dynamic. I see it as feeling the toe of an elephant , and attempting to describe the whole animal, while blinded, lets not forget , you have never encountered one before.

Science must not be bound by absolutism, nor do we want to mix sciences that are rigid with those that are dynamic. Now I come to another aspect of what is being overlooked, and that is the simple feat of Humanity of making intuitive leaps , using known aspects of a problem, and using that wondrous computive mechanism, the brain. No science can be so good , so as to eliminate the need for intuitive leaps, so why does the basic institutional setup in this country overlook the reservoir of combined intellect, in those whom it considers less than brilliant? Because being brilliant is not the mechanism needed to trigger an intuitive leap, it's need, plain and simple ( lets sing this together, so we understand what I am aiming at , IE; "I'm better than you aaaaare") , the latter small additive is childish , but describes the situation at a simple level, and once thought about , shows we are at times , bound by not so high standards of the past.

There is no place a poor person can make his findings (Intuitive leap) known, the academic society has no time to sort through mundane aspects of a device or idea to get at the meat of it, glaringly simple to the one who sees it, but the language barrier is nearly absolute. Business is notorious for taking others ideas , and running with them, but the one whose idea it was , is left out, so it's simply never shown to them (Business)

The latter is not to aim at anyone, rather to show where the trends have taken us, as the great surges of technological change in history, has been when all the people were involved, not a select few as has become the current trend. I won't get any deeper in this, but those of you who are students of history can fill in the coming gaps.

Now , science is duty bound, to take all aspects into account , and derive a law by allowing for these various aspects, omitting an causation spoils the outcome. To derive a "future" Law, such as light speed , before reliable testing is done when the technology has progressed to that point ,where it's a necessity, is not in the interest of science, humanity, or industry, rather it's a impediment , because if someone experienced one of those intuitive leaps associated with it, and it had a counter effect that did not follow the established laws of science, it would be lost forever , due to rigid opposition within the ranks of academia.

Understand, what is in place , is the result of carefully thought out acts by the greatest intellects of our history, unfortunately, the rules in place , are at times misread, and misused due to ego , childishness, or simple ignorance, as the greatest brains had strange abhorrences like lack of ability to remove themselves from a rainstorm, AND I wish to add, the ability to retain massive amounts of data verbatim, is not the necessary criteria for intelligence, intelligence is the ability of using all that you know to create something new, and those who see themselves as superior ,due to this aberration, you are about to be replaced by a computer.

"Hear their words carefully, they are derived from their thoughts; watch their actions , as they are from the thoughts that drive their words they speak, watch their habits , as they are derived from their true nature , all this causes their character , whether lie or truth , as they lead , and all these , shape OUR future "