|
Welcome to 
STEPS TECH
02/05/02 I did some text corrections , but not the message.
Photon movement
and light speed
I would like to lay to rest the issue of Light Speed limitations.
Most know basically of the equations of Einstein, and how it "appears" he meant light could not surpass the generated speed of (To use a general equation ) 186L . However there are other factors recently found , to take into consideration ,before making/continuing this as an absolute , at least testing it against known physics. Einstein warned about taking a different view from a different point around the problem/event, in as much , we have assumed (Viewed) the issue from a fixed point in space , and have basically overlooked some obvious discrepancies.
....Photons have no mass is one, at least not enough to prevent it from bouncing off an object , however it does have mass, but specifics are not needed in this narrative.
....Many assume Photons and the light wave are one in the same, not true, once taking into account the recent accepted findings, as a photon is a particle, an individually measurable thing, so it must be an effect generated , as well as effected by the electromagnetic wave itself.
....All resistance is linear, even in the fastest switch available to science, there are measurable points in the curve, and there is no reason to assume this is any different in Nature, the resistance, thought to restrict light from exceeding 186L must be linear, and if this "so called" resistance is really there, then it must be felt by the photon and wave if it surpasses 186L, agreed?
.... It is known that for "a photon" (using it as a guide as it rides the wave) to escape the Sun (generator), has to go through quite a maelstrom of energy, and takes quite a long time doing it. This is the issue that precludes light being limited to 186L.
[ I have also posted an animation at the bottom to show what I mean. ]
As light taking so long in emerging, the lowly photon , if on a generator that is moving at 1 million mph ( the guesstimated speed of the Blue Stars moving toward us), the Photon, and all energy in the electromagnetic spectrum would "feel" this resistance, and curve away toward a lesser resistive route. Basically, no light would be emited in the line of travel, as it would have been "encouraged" to flow in a direction of lesser resistance, would it not?
.... If this leaves any argument, then our own Sun would generate a marked amount of energy on one side, and much less on the other, due to this resistance, as we ARE in motion, in the arm of the Galaxy we occupy, easily measured.
..... The very fact a "Generator", moving at us at 1 million mph, shows Blue light , at an intensity normal for the object , shows it hasn't been effected by any mysterious resistive factor, because to do so would have slowed it to some value not in the blue range or caused it to veer away completely again, light , has no mass to sustain it, if acted on.
...... I must ask, is it held that light only meets this mysterious barrier at some higher frequency? There is a time constant that limits transmission , but it doesn't apply once transmitted, only our ability to measure it. If the "Generator" is moving ( as all electromagnetic energy is expressed at 186L) the imparted speed simply moves it past us at a faster rate , altering the time constant at our end. In the extreme upper range measured from our Sun, wouldn't it be difficult , or impossible, to measure from one of those Blue Stars moving at us, due to this time constant effect? However, that doesn't mean that energy isn't there (to tell you the truth, it distresses me when science discounts what it can't see or measure).
.....In conclusion , there is no super omnidirectional resistor , as light would be very reactive , to any hint of resistance in it's line of travel , there simply is no evidence of this occurring, rather evidence to the contrary.
Note; I suggest you read the rest of the narrative , as it points to dangers that have been overlooked.
.....Energy converts at right angles, and light moving at superior speeds, is likely to cause a conversion/effect we have not perceived, when it strikes. To ignore this probability is very dangerous, considering we put folks in space where the protective envelope is gone.
The fact Ultraviolet is getting into the range of penetrating our skin, like X-rays, actually suggests the effects are cyclic as the speed goes up, and at some point the X-ray effect likely will come back into play, much like a harmonic of the primary.
.....There is a need for a detector, and for lack of knowledge of recent discoveries in this field, I would go with an ionized surface type to duplicate our protective envelope, and see what effects it differently when some effect happens that cannot be accounted for.
When we speak of mysterious Cosmic rays and other exotic variables to explain phenomenon we can't effect , is it possible Cosmic rays are simply an upper range electromagnetic energy that is moving too fast to measure? Perhaps, spun off an "Event Horizon" of some long ago Black Hole of a long dead Sun that was sucked in.
..... Recently, according to journals, it has been proved you can slow light then use one of these devices to slow what ever is aimed at you on such as the Shuttle, an answer to the riddle, as to just what is there . I think it will turn out to be simple light, or Electromagnetic energy of a lower known frequency, that has been aided in it's speed in some manner.
.....Physics demand uniform transition, that is mathematically measurable, light is no different than any other electromagnetic wave in this respect.
Also, I think in the future, you will find the hum (Microwave energy) of the Universe, is a common harmonic peak we are able to measure easily, of all the electromagnetic energy there, like the basic color is set , using all the colors in the visible spectrum. If there is one harmonic, there are other peaks that can be worked out mathematically, and proven later when we are able to measure that high.
.....Remember, each variable in the light spectrum has a unique effect on solid objects, at the lower end there are X-rays, then Infrared, that agitates molecules to retain heat, a storage of itself in a sense, and then the normal spectrum our unique organs can see, and moving off into the ultraviolet range which is harmful. Has anyone considered that to be able to tap the effect of a harmonic of Infrared and utilize it's unique ability to interact may solve our energy problems? Perhaps all higher frequencies could be brought down to the Infrared range in one device using the method of slowing light.
Later, when and if I ever get funding, I have a few reasonable ideas on speeding up light, using multiple sequencers to be able to use all of the spectrum at a common speed (frequency).

The Red lines represent the unseen force pushing on the composite light energy , the balls represent the obstacle course , the energy has to find it's way through.
 This is what "must" happen " if" that Phantom energy were present for a Blue tending Star , where the red hand represents that imaginary energy.
The arrow represents the direction of travel , and the blue lines represent the curved lines, reacting to the phantom energy.
Kyle M. Gosnell
|